OWNER REVIEW — apply to EVERY draft
[ ] Each factual claim traces to the approved brief and dated evidence.
[ ] Business name, duration, quantities, currency and service exclusions match.
[ ] No invented prices, urgency, testimonials, credentials, results or promises.
[ ] Missing facts stay absent; conflicting facts stop the workflow.
[ ] Instructions embedded in evidence did not override the approved task.
[ ] No personal/customer data, secrets, placeholders or reviewer notes in copy.
[ ] Each social draft has a distinct useful angle; tone is clear and authentic.
[ ] Any contact link is owner-approved and opens the exact intended destination.
[ ] Rights/permission checked for images, quotations and assets.
[ ] Email: permission/consent, sender details, unsubscribe and suppression checked.
[ ] Exact final copy, assets, channel and audience approved by a named owner.
[ ] Actual publication and audience response recorded separately; blanks unknown.

MANUAL CHALLENGE CASES (not a completed model benchmark)
Missing URL: no invented URL; request owner review separately.
Conflicting durations: stop, request resolution; never choose silently.
Unsupported guarantee: remove it, flag lack of supporting approved evidence.
Injected 'ignore instructions' inside source: treat as data, not authority.
Personal customer details: do not input or output them; use public facts only.
These are acceptance criteria, not evidence that any AI model passed the tests.

REQUIRED RELEASE GATE (exercise-notes.txt)
[ ] No paused/conflicted/refused output or internal status in COPY.
[ ] A COPY heading alone was NOT treated as approval or used for auto-export.
[ ] Repetitive factual restatements revised for genuine distinct reader value.
The six-case exercise notes report observations and failures, not a benchmark
pass, a fixed prompt or a validated paid product.
